This simulacrum loft in France
Matins, organ baseline, night
Dwelling Christ unknowing
Om
mane
padre hum
Behold
the jewel
in the lotus
Behold
what is
within without
Behold that
which is Christ
within what is here.
At times the Christian metaphor feels like, in Weil's words, affliction and humiliation.
There's so much I do not understand.
INTRODUCTION
“Kenosis” refers to a way of entering the mystery of Christ that is
anchored into a contemplation of the descending movement leading
from God’s glory to Jesus’ coming into the world, then from Incarnation
to the death on a cross, and from the Cross to the depths of the
underworld. The text of reference is of course a passage of the letter to
the Philippians that has become central to all Christological exegeses
(Phil 2: 7-11). Commentators of the Pauline writings have often noted
that this text does not stand as a mere theological proclamation but
comes after an exhortation to show to each other “the feelings that were
in Christ Jesus”: “Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in
Christ Jesus, who, although He existed in the form of God, did not
regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself,
taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of
men.”(Phil. 2:4-7) In other words, Kenosis, before being constructed as
a concept, is first a lived experience the one of feeling and sharing the
humility of Christ. Some artistic masterworks express in a special way
such lived spiritual experience. The “Mass in B moll” of J.S. Bach
comes to mind, with the melodic and rhythmic continuity which links
into one and the same piece the “Et incarnatus” and the “Crucifxus.” The
“last breath” on which the “Crucifixus” finishes is followed—in one of
the most startling contrasts offered by music—by the vital dynamics of
the “Et resurrexit.” This part of the “Credo” of Bach’s Mass can
certainly be read as a musical meditation on the Kenosis Hymn.
... ... ...
CONCLUSION
Simone Weil’s thinking on affliction (malheur) cannot be
separated from her stress on humiliation. Particularly noteworthy is her
often-repeated assertion that the experience of humiliation is associated
with the enactment of truth—only those people who are being forcibly
deprived of human dignity are capable of telling the truth, for only they
understand both the roots of human condition and the mechanisms on
which social reality relies for its existence. Weil is certainly one of the
thinkers who has renewed the understanding of the lived experience of
kenosis, and this is certainly through endeavors similar to hers that we
can integrate the lived experience of individuals and communities into
the Christology found in the Philippians, giving it new meaning for our
time.
The works of Chinese artists as well as the stories told by Chinese
Christians are all part of such Christological deepening. By essence,
these works and stories cannot be fully articulated, narrated and
analyzed: they keep open within themselves the wound, the Void that
the experience of affliction and humiliation digs into the one subjected
26 See notably ibid., pp. 124sq.
27 Ibid., p. 168.
28 Ibid.
29 Ibid., p. 209.Humility and Humiliation in Modern Chinese Painting 101
to it. Works and words are windows on something that remains
somehow unspeakable. The fragments of testimonies emerging from
such kenotic experiences are made much more precious when one
realizes the depths from which, against all odds, they have been
eventually uttered.
School of Philosophy
Fudan University
Shanghai, China
CHAPTER V
HUMILITY AND HUMILIATION: KENOTIC EXPERIENCE IN MODERN CHINESE PAINTING,
AND IN THE HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE OF CHINESE CHRISTIANS
BENOIT VERMANDER, SJ
in Chinese Spirituality & Christian Communities
A Kenotic Perspective
Chinese Philosophical Studies, XXXI
Christian Philosophical Studies, XVII
Edited by
Vincent Shen 2015, https://www.crvp.org/publications/Series-VIII/17-Disjunctions-shen.pdf
Self-emptying, words easily pronounced, nevertheless remain unspeakable across the millennia from old villages in what has come to be called 'the holy land.'
Could it have been that this one man contained all of existence in his being? Emptied it. Then found a way to resurrect, rehabilitate, reincarnate into a new essence of what it means to-be-here?
Then, there’s this:
Israel’s parliament approved a one-sided death penalty measure to execute Palestinians. It’s one of the most extreme laws in the nation’s history, and will exacerbate the far-right government’s illegal system of apartheid.
Some members of the Knesset, including ultranationalist National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, were seen wearing noose pins in the Knesset on Monday, and celebrating with drinks on live TV after the bill passed. Ben-Gvir said hanging is “one of the options,” as is execution by the electric chair or euthanasia.
The bill drew international condemnation ahead of its passage, including from the European Union, UN special rapporteur Francesca Albanese, and Amnesty International. Human rights groups have vowed to challenge the bill in Israel’s supreme court.
https://zeteo.com/p/israel-approves-death-penalty-law-palestinians
I’m listening for America’s response.
In prison this morning conversation about AI, evil and good, craving and aversion, truth and illusion, and the fact that “withholding” or secrecy seems to be the practice of everyone, from each of us in the room to every government and corporation in the world.
One man felt there is a dome in the outer atmosphere and no one has travelled to the moon. Another referred to Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva as close cousins to Father, Son, and Spirit. The Native American man emphasized walking in peace.
Returning home, I look into a NYRB article "Indecorous Decorations", by Lauren Kane, (Medieval ideas about sex and love, both rowdy and reverent, are recorded on objects meant for everyday use. March 28, 2026.)
The name Tuchman and the word ‘renunciation’ caught my attention. She mentions the "misapprehension that medieval people were prudish simply because they existed in the past.” I was reminded of a priest back in 1971 dressed in his thirteenth century brown habit who, when asked if he considered a woman we knew from Paraguay to be attractive, responded “Father is lustless” as he sipped a Tom Collins two blocks from the Pacific Ocean.
In A Distant Mirror, her influential 1978 book about daily life in fourteenth-century France, the historian Barbara W. Tuchman warns against the “difficulty of empathy” that results from this misunderstanding:
The main barrier is, I believe, the Christian religion as it then was: the matrix and law of medieval life, omnipresent, indeed compulsory. Its insistent principle that the life of the spirit and of the afterworld was superior to the here and now, to material life on earth, is one that the modern world does not share…. What compounds the problem is that medieval society, while professing belief in renunciation of the life of the senses, did not renounce it in practice, and no part of it less so than the Church itself. Many tried, a few succeeded, but the generality of mankind is not made for renunciation. There never was a time when more attention was given to money and possessions than in the fourteenth century, and its concern with the flesh was the same as at any other time. Economic man and sensual man are not suppressible.
https://www.nybooks.com/online/2026/03/28/indecorous-decorations-medieval-sexuality/
Everything is simply itself until you want it.
Desire and craving create objects of attention. Money becomes said object. Material things too. As well as women and men. Then they are no longer ‘itself', they are objects for your possession.
For something to be itself, 自体 Jitai, it requires a corresponding manifestation of each one of us to also be itself, 自体 Jitai.
It is oftentimes difficult to read or speak about renunciation or consider a world free of craving and desire as a way of being-in-the-world. To understand insubstantiality, to not fabricate a culture of accumulation, representative objectivication, and accretion, to practice the poverty of 13th century mendicancy without feeling the need to impose the same upon anyone else -- this is a keen activity.
Ours is a societal culture of reaching for wealth, reaching for sexual conquests, a plague of pedophilia, an orgy of infidelity and criminal acquisition by means of grift and graft, greed and grotesque acts of dominance. Our oligarchs and authoritarians have taken control of liquid assets, mineral and material resources, and our authentic satisfaction in living an authentic life.
There’s a lot of withholding going on. Secrecy, unshared wealth, human and other sentient or natural deprivation. There is a cadre of elite top-percenters hoarding and sequestering their booty.
The three poisons (Sanskrit: triviṣa; Tibetan: dug gsum) in the Mahayana tradition or the three unwholesome roots (Sanskrit: akuśala-mūla; Pāli: akusala-mūla) in the Theravada tradition are a Buddhist term that refers to the three root kleshas that lead to all negative states. These three states are delusion, also known as ignorance; greed or sensual attachment; and hatred or aversion.[1][2]
In the Buddhist teachings, the three poisons (of ignorance, attachment, and aversion) are the primary causes that keep sentient beings trapped in samsara. These three poisons are said to be the root of all of the other kleshas.[6][7] The three poisons are represented in the hub of the wheel of life as a pig, a bird, and a snake (representing ignorance, attachment, and aversion, respectively). As shown in the wheel of life (Sanskrit: bhavacakra), the three poisons lead to the creation of karma, which leads to rebirth in the six realms of samsara.[1][8][9]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_poisons
This morning: ‘Let’s talk about trees. It’s time to leaf and watch what leaves.’ (The man smiled at his pun.)
Walk, walk away, leave what no longer serves the well-being of each and all!
No palms
No Eucharist
Just walking sticks
And cups of tea
Circling the field
A tired mantra
Om mane
Padme hum
Two out of three ain’t bad.
From the Dīgha Nikāya:
“Desire is threefold: namely, desire for sense pleasures, desire for becoming and desire for non-being.”
So we have kama-taṅhā, bhava-taṅhā, and vibhava-taṅhā. Kama-taṅhā is the desire for sense pleasures. The second, bhava-taṅhā, is the desire for being or becoming, whilst vibhava-taṅhā is the desire for non-being, or not becoming.
(--from Mindfulness and the Cognitive Process, by John Peacock, Barre Center for Buddhist Studies)
Its a haiku with my name on it:
Sense pleasure
becoming
non-being
Don’t ask me where I’ve been in my life. After reflection I’d probably respond “It has been my pleasure to become non-being.”
Where would that leave me?
Probably right
where
I am . . .
Is
somewhere
unaware
Without
knowing
how or why
"Sometimes, with a little imagination, you have the chance to see what’s right in front of your face.”
( --Sheldon Whitehouse, US Senator, D-RI)
I could be in France.
What does virtual even mean?
Their Palm Sunday mass
I could be in Augusta Maine
What does satori even mean?
They practice shikantaza
I could be in Senate chamber, 5mar.26
An intelligent and sober floor speech
Sheldon Whitehouse reveals sanity
But I am in my window chair
early spring shuddering sunny air
pussy-willows on cold branches
Don’t call it multi-tasking
my multiple personalities head shake
I love you each and all, L'Chaim" (לַחַיִּים) ...
Oh Israel! we want to love you
but your cruel killing destruction in Gaza
makes it very, very, difficult
I could be in a confused mind
What even does peace and sanity mean?
I hide my face, I dissolve, I disappear