It sounds like an academic distinction -- duality vs polarity.
It might turn out to be the crux of our current political struggle.
Duality is characteristic of the mental structure to the same extent that polarity is a hallmark of the mythical structure. But duality differs in one essential respect from polarity: in polarity correspondences are valid. Every correspondence is a complement, a completion of the whole.
Duality is the mental splitting and tearing apart of polarity, and, from the correspondences of polarity, duality abstracts and quantifies the oppositions or antitheses.… from duality only a deficient, because unstable, form of unity can be realized as the unification of opposites in a third aspect.
(--Jean Gebser, [EPO 85, 86])
Duality intends a rupturing, a severing of what is connected, and a subsequent analysis as to which end of the split is better, richer, more worthy, and which end should be diminished, denigrated, or eliminated.
This mechanism of perception has long been with us. It represents a cutting off of one from another, a hierarchy of worth, and a categorization of those who belong from those who do not belong.
If I have any glimmer of understanding about holarchy and grace, I would want to further explore a world view that embraces and appreciates one as another, one within another, one an-other.
A holon is something that is simultaneously a whole in and of itself, as well as a part of a larger whole. In this way, a holon can be considered a subsystem within a larger hierarchical system.[1]
The holon represents a way to overcome the dichotomy between parts and wholes, as well as a way to account for both the self-assertive and the integrative tendencies of organisms.[2] Holons are sometimes discussed in the context of self-organizing holarchic open (SOHO) systems.[2][1]
The word holon (Greek: áœ
Î»ÎżÎœ) is a combination of the Greek holos (áœ
λοÏ) meaning 'whole', with the suffix -on which denotes a particle or part (as in proton and neutron). Holons are self-reliant units that possess a degree of independence and can handle contingencies without asking higher authorities for instructions (i.e., they have a degree of autonomy). These holons are also simultaneously subject to control from one or more of these higher authorities. The first property ensures that holons are stable forms that are able to withstand disturbances, while the latter property signifies that they are intermediate forms, providing a context for the proper functionality for the larger whole. (wikipedia)
The whole belongs to no-one, thus, to every-one. This sense of belonging is not the sense of possession, as in real estate, or furniture, a financial portfolio, or a closet full of shirts.
The whole, it might be said, is where God is. Perhaps, better said, the whole is what God is.
So many have difficulty, in the traditional parlance, believing in God. This might be because so many of us dwell in the "parts." We dwell in the fragmentary conception of reality as bits and pieces that are best owned and traded, bolstering the concept of the economy variously navigated by different "classes" of society whose social class is predicated on wealth and possessions.
The very notion that there is a "whole" is a dubious consideration most think is better left to abstract thinkers, philosophers, and theologians. It is not meant for practical people, movers and shakers, or the common folk whose very livelihood is predicated on the bits and pieces of hourly wage or yearly salary minus the cost of housing, food, clothing, and distracting amusements.
No, they might say, the whole is a luxury most cannot afford to think about, unless it is packaged as some heavenly destination attained after a life of ethical and moral rectitude and strong faith in a God who will reward or punish based on your beliefs and actions.
Polarity suggests an interconnection. A spectrum of continuity. A realization that no one is out of the loop.
The notion of wholeness, where, it might be said, each being is everywhere and nowhere, can be unsettling to our dualistic thinking.
"Whole sight; or all the rest is desolation" -- is how John Fowles began his novel Daniel Martin.
We live, perhaps, in a desolate time. We are so busy trying to serve the ego and be better than some perceived enemy.
"I am better than you" it seems, is easier to say than "I see the best in you."
Our political theater, nightly, performs the same play with the same lines and the same intent -- to better the other.
To better the other rather than to become the other.
Wherein there is no other.
Just us. No one, no being, no thing left out.
The whole of it.