My mother once told me I was cruel because I remembered conversations and things told me.
I know, I know -- quoting bible stories as told probably fits that cruelty.
According to the book of Genesis, after cre-
ating the universe, god created Adam (2: 7). He
(god’s reported gender) forbad Adam from eating
fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil
(2: 17). After god decided Adam needed a help-
mate, he created Eve (21–2). Gen 3 explains that
a serpent tempted Eve to eat said fruit – rules be
damned. She ate the fruit and gave Adam a bite.
God was not happy. He cursed Eve: she had to
conceive and carry children (16). Adam had to
work the land.
As many of you may know, some religious
individuals try to explain this (and other) sto-
ries away, to claim that they are metaphorical.
Many believers reject these reinterpretations.
Whether metaphorical or not, these spell trouble
for a Christian conception of god.
God punished Adam not for doing ‘wrong’
in any ordinary sense of that term, but for
disobeying him. God told Adam not to eat
said fruit. (He could have told them: ‘don’t
pick your nose while standing on your left
leg’.) But why is disobeying god wrong unless
what Adam did was wrong, independent of the
command? Otherwise, god looks like a mob boss
who expects compliance, no matter what the
command. That does not sound like the actions
of a noble creature.
Then in Gen 6: 11–15, we learn about Noah.
God did not like the way Noah’s neighbours
acted. So, god devised a scheme to save Noah
and punish everyone else. He instructed Noah
to build a boat on which he could carry his fam-
ily and one pair of all animal species. Then the
rain came. Forty days and nights. Non-stop. Any
creature not on the boat died, including all peo-
ple, no matter their age, and all animals – sans
those fortunate enough to be chosen for a boat
ride.
Is that a suitable death for two-year-olds,
mentally challenged twelve-year-olds, or George
and Georgina Giraffe? What would we think of
a human who did this? We would deem him a
‘moral monster’. So we should. We would not
revere him or consider him kind, generous or
loving.
Then there is Job as described in the book
by that name. Job was upright. But Satan (why
did god create Satan?) came to god and bet him
that Job would no longer continue to worship
him if he (Job) lost all he cared for. On a bet
god allowed Job to lose his family, wealth and
42
https://doi.org/10.1017/S147717562510078X Published online by Cambridge University PressThink • Vol 24 • No 71 • Autumn 2025
standing. By golly, he was going to show that
devil!
God won the wager. Job never cursed god. But
to what end? So that god could demonstrate that
he was right? What would we say of a human
engaging in such a wager? We would not praise
him.
(-from, Living Without a God, by Hugh LaFollette)
I suppose the biblical author, like Eliot’s Prufrock, would add:
It is impossible to say just what I mean!
But as if a magic lantern threw the nerves in patterns on a screen:
Would it have been worth while
If one, settling a pillow or throwing off a shawl,
And turning toward the window, should say:
"That is not it at all,
That is not what I meant, at all."
https://www.maths.tcd.ie/~busy/prufrock.html#:~:text=It%20is%20impossible%20to%20say,I%20meant%2C%20at%20all.%22
So we are left with the scholar’s dilemma -- is it fact, fiction, myth, metaphor, analogically generated stories pointing beyond themselves?
Is “God” a literary device served up to initiate a cultural/political baseline for future capitalization and control?
Or, are we merely screwed by thinking independently and going against commonly held belief?
These days, everything is a wager -- from sporting events to the Strait of Hormuz to tomorrow morning's stock market numbers.
Place your bets, gentlemen and ladies!
And never give a sucker an even break!