Hence I was introduced to the Russian novel Oblomov.
Oblomov (Russian: Обломов, pronounced [ɐˈbloməf]) is the second novel by Russian writer Ivan Goncharov, first published in 1859. Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is the central character of the novel, portrayed as the ultimate incarnation of the superfluous man, a symbolic character in 19th-century Russian literature. Oblomov is a young, generous nobleman who seems incapable of making important decisions or undertaking any significant actions. Throughout the novel, he rarely leaves his room or bed. In the first 50 pages, he only manages to move from his bed to a chair.[1]
The novel was popular when it came out, and some of its characters and devices have imprinted on Russian culture and language. (--Wikipedia)
I found an obituary of a Trappist monk, Dom Bernardo Bonowitz. Here’s what was written:
He had a keen sense of the absurd and a terrific sense of humor. Early on in his illness he began talking about “Oblamov.” Oblamov, it turns out, is the anti-hero of a 19th century comic Russian novel by Goncharov about an extremely lazy Russian aristocrat who can’t do anything or make even trivial decisions. He is the embodiment of the superfluous man. It takes him the first fifty pages of the novel to move from his bed to a chair. That Bernardo was comparing himself to Oblamov struck me as very funny—both ridiculous and yet in a way apropos. A friend of Oblamov at one point tells the protagonist he’s suffering from “Oblamovitis”—and Bernardo and I liked to puzzle his various doctors by suggesting we thought that might be his problem—what did they think: acute Oblamovitis? Had they heard of the condition? More than just an endearing personality trait, Fr. Bernardo’s sense of humor—part of what made him such a sought after speaker and retreat master— was a spiritual resource, and sometimes, at least, allowed him to transcend even very bitter anguish.
Born Jewish, the gifted son of a troubled and demanding father, Bernardo converted to Catholicism in his teens, a decision which created a terrible rift—both with his father and within himself. One of his main preoccupations during his illness was how to reconcile his Jewishness and his Christianity. In fact in our last real conversation, just a few weeks before he died, this was what he spoke about. While he may not have been able to resolve this tension he did, many years ago, reconcile with his father, and cherished the friendship that developed between them. That he chose forgiveness instead of resentment, despite so much suffering, strikes me as a clear sign of both the grace at work in his life and his basic goodness as a man. https://www.trappists.org/2025/02/13/the-passing-of-bernardo-bonowitz/
I, too, suffer from Oblamovitus.
Have for a long time. It's not any of the illnesses, nor of the spate of pneumonia this recent month, nor of younger distraction and diversion from any settled path of work. No, it's the sense of always having been superfluous, never necessary, perhaps a bit absurd, perhaps an imposter, a Prufrockian fool having measured out my life in coffee spoons.
There's no respite from non-continuation. I have lived a life of non-continuation. A non-initiatory quasi-resignation realization of one's absurdity standing in the face of continual effacement.
Still, I enjoy coffee-milk, periodic cups of tea, seltzer-water, and Zero mixed berry Powerade. I've not much of an appetite, I lose weight faster than rain, and my oncologist sent me with his two nurses to the Emergency Department down and around warrens of hallways to be assessed and worked-up for four hours yesterday. They told me go home, try to breathe, and let the stubborn remains of pneumonia find their way out of my lungs.
The dog Ensō visits my room. He is sweet, calm, and snores.
In my phantasmagoric mind I am a novice of Anthony of the Desert (251-356), a Trappist, a Franciscan, a Benedictine, a Carthusian, a wandering nomad, and a Zen monk. In dreams before waking I am walking some variation of cloister that both confuses and comforts. I allow as how some variation of reincarnated retrieval is taking place in unconscious defusion (and diffusion). I am somehow still where I was some past ago, and now my recollective imagination interfuses what and where I do not comprehend into a phasic intertwining that reminds me of something (perhaps) once experienced and now crisscrossing the synapses of mind with alluring simplicity and solemnity.
The embodiment of the superfluous man. Millenia of monastic/eremitic wandering, never at home anywhere.
A suspicious realization that:
No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be;
Am an attendant lord, one that will do
To swell a progress, start a scene or two,
Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool,
Deferential, glad to be of use,
Politic, cautious, and meticulous;
Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse;
At times, indeed, almost ridiculous—
Almost, at times, the Fool.
I grow old ... I grow old ...
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.
(--T.S.Eliot, in Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock)
I no longer have to reside in a stable presentation of established conformity to societal or cultural expectation. I am homeless, although, for the moment, not unhoused.
Wraithlike I wander through the weather and timepieces of the day.
In silentio (perhaps sub silentio) I am given to understand that my life has been overturned:
Sub silentio is a Latin legal phrase that translates to "under silence" or "in silence." It refers to something that is understood, implied, or done without being explicitly stated, discussed, or formally acknowledged. It is commonly used when a court overrules a prior ruling or decides a legal point quietly without directly referencing or addressing. (--search.)
Or returned.
Or, coincidentally, retrieved.