The prospect that universal, infinite, and eternal reality might be localized in an individual, an instant, or a particular yard of earth, is both intriguing and mind-boggling.
If so, if true, then a career of teaching ethics at university wants a do-over.
On second thought, who'd affirm such an outlandish proposition?
We all want resurrection in some form. Jesus’ resurrection is a potent, focused, and compelling statement about what God is still and forever doing with the universe and with humanity. Science strongly confirms this statement using its own terms: metamorphosis, condensation, evaporation, seasonal changes, and the life cycles of everything from butterflies to stars. The natural world is constantly dying and being reborn in different forms. God appears to be resurrecting everything all the time and everywhere. It is not something to “believe in” as much as it is something to observe and be taught by.
I choose to believe in Jesus’ bodily resurrection because it localizes the whole Mystery in this material and earthly world and in our own bodies too—the only world we know and the world that God created and loves and in which God chose to incarnate. (Read all of 1 Corinthians 15 where Paul keeps saying this in many ways.) [1]
If the original divine incarnation was and is true, then resurrection is both inevitable and irreversible. If the Big Bang was the external starting point of the eternal Christ Mystery, then we know this eternal logos is leading creation somewhere good, and the universe is not chaotic or meaningless. Alpha and Omega are in fact one and the same. [3]
--Richard Rohr, CAC, Resurrection and Incarnation, 3apr24
[1] Adapted from Richard Rohr, Immortal Diamond: The Search for Our True Self (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2013), 86–88.
At last night's Tuesday Evening Conversation, Chris, Tina, Asha, Saskia and I circled around Jean Gebser and Ken Wilber's takes on the structures of consciousness and the indications of mutation into the (upcoming) integral structure and the concretion of the spiritual.
Gebser writes:
What happens to the earth - and the earth is nothing but an event which in materialization has become progressively slower - originates in more encompassing and spatio-temporally non-localizable interconnections. (ibid)
We'll have to re-visit the whole-within-the-whole conversation, the localized and non-localizable, the spooky notion of quantum entanglement.
Until then, I'll sneak in the question -- Is any act, is every act -- is any thought, is every thought -- a non-localized impression on every other place, time, and being in the cosmos?
If we are, indeed, interconnected in ways we have not yet begun to consider, is the two thousand year old story/mythology of one man's transcendence of the there-to-fore limitations of human existence and its spiritual/material contours meant to be, for us, here and now, a meditation and contemplation whose significance exceeds our current structure of consciousness as we stare into the bottom of our coffee cups and empty box of donuts?
Bring on the nor'easter snow storm!
Let's go out into the gale and drift away!