Do the right thing
Saturday, June 15, 2024
there’s worry we are being recorded
What you believe is
what is seen
What is seen
Is what you believe
No belief
Nothing seen
It is easy
To love God
There’s nothing
To it
Love is
Not belief
It sees itself
In what is seen
Nothing
Else
Friday, June 14, 2024
Thursday, June 13, 2024
Wednesday, June 12, 2024
correct(ion)
All is
(not) lost
this and that
(still) --
finding this
(and) that . . .
nonagenarian
(friend) writes
...
-- ion, any atom or group of atoms that bears one or more positive or negative electrical charges. (Britannica)
Tuesday, June 11, 2024
preghi
Yes, I pray
For you, for me
I pray we become human
Free, safe, and come to dwell
In our true home… Happily —
What does our “true home” look like?
I suspect we will know it
When we find ourselves in it.
May you find
Yourself well
Within it!
vetus
willing to be old
each day comes and goes, can't help
losing this and that
looking back seeing nothing
looking ahead, nothing there
...
* vetus, veteris M; [Latin] old, aged, ancient, former, veteran, experienced, long-standing, chronic
Monday, June 10, 2024
Sunday, June 09, 2024
bridges for inter-cultural communication
Makes you wonder what the 'human-being' makes of, or contributes to, the fact of 'Being-Itself' sounding through our being-human.
Thus one could claim that the lack of an elaborated anthropological vision made Heidegger’s philosophy after the ‘turning’ philosophically anti-Hellenic. The quest for ethics and moral distinctions that have bedeviled the students of his work must be incorporated within a quest for a complete anthropology delineated by his works, an anthropology that would look at Being in its anthropic re-creation of the silence of nature and the absence of god. Only then will the ethical consequences of the “livable” part of his philosophy become apparent and Heidegger’s philosophy regain the moral authority to reveal the essence of being. Heidegger’s philosophy is arguably the most daring hypothesis about the human condition in recent centuries; yet his answers somehow do not do justice to the questions he poses and show the unredeemed debt that he himself owed to his society, class and personality. Yet the hypothesis remains valid and still spurs thinking on; indeed it makes philosophical thinking immerse itself into the ‘thick questions’ of the mind and helps reformulate important aspects of the European tradition. Indeed, Heidegger’s thought has stimulated great Japanese thinkers like Keiji Nishitani, Nishida Kitaro and Masao Abe and has contributed to the re- interpretation of Dogen and to a degree of Nagarjuna himself. Thus it builds bridges for inter-cultural communication that express a new understanding of the anthropic in history. The cross-pollination of his philosophy leads to a new anthropological vision of being in history and time above and beyond the cultural limits of the philosopher’s origins. For to philosophise does not simply mean to ask “why there are beings rather than nothing?” but “why beings that are experience nothing?”. Then Being ceases to be mute and becomes the true being of the human presence.
(--in, Heidegger and the Aesthetics of Living, xv, Edited by Vrasidas Karalis, 2008)
Perhaps it is our 'coming to word' that creates, organizes, and causes to emerge into appearance that which is hidden and that which is not-yet and coming-to-be into what we might call the 'umwelt of now.'
Our contemporary culture suffers an aphasia that stifles authentic communication which might build and nourish out and away from decadent morbidity and caustic rhetoric of decimation, elimination, and ostracization.
Do we not long for an aesthetic eloquent in creativity, compassion, and cooperating community toward wholesome interrelationality and open-hearted caring?
I do!
And you, too!