“Doxa” in classical Greek, means opinion, not knowledge (which is “episteme”). I have tired of opinions. I long for knowledge.
At its simplest, an opinion is a belief or judgment not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. We express opinions constantly – about the weather, politics, art, or the best way to brew coffee. Yet, in philosophy, particularly within the classical Greek tradition, doxa carries a weightier, more critical connotation. It represents the realm of common belief, popular judgment, or even mere appearance, often contrasted with the more rigorous and stable domain of episteme, or true knowledge. While an opinion might happen to be correct, its correctness often lacks the deep justification and understanding that elevates it to the status of knowledge.
https://www.planksip.org/the-nature-of-true-opinion-doxa-and-opinion-1761309301427/
When I think about the oftentimes skewed perception and ensuing distortion of higher values in our everyday society and culture, it occurs to me how I’ve come to translate and understand the Tibetan mantra Om Mani Padme Hum.
You can look up its traditional translation (search).
My idiosyncratic translation is “behold what is within without; behold what is without within.”
Within the within is where the darkness of unknowing the unknown resides. This Reality beyond reality, undoubtedly and conceivably the presence of God, might be where what we call Love originates and resounds.
Love might be “all that is” but this isness might be in the dark unmanifest until it is evoked and embodied by individuals who’ve encountered that withinness while longing to make it felt and experienced without.
God might be giving-being, but God might not be a given. In the christian narrative there is a necessary accompaniment of a human co-conspirator to exemplify the within/without, without/within of wholeness/holiness passing through the human condition/causation.
This death to all that is obvious, material, and askew, this suffering of the reality of human behavior, this descent into the underworld of suffering and despair — and beyond — begins the new understanding of enfleshing God and embodying the spirit of recuperating love and sanctifying grace.
What is within is now capable of being without, what is freshly without is willing to reciprocally recenter within the whole as an offering of communion and commitment.
To behold this, to become this, is a spiritual/physical practice always new and always holy.
It is my suspicion that our contemporary external world will remain dully oblivious to a compassionate internal world until more and more of our fellow aspirants find their way through obtuse ignorance into clear and fearless incarnation of that-which-is, in-itself, of-itself the Reality beyond reality.
Encourage one another!
There is another way of being/living in this world.
Andiamo!





