Saturday, February 14, 2026

hints, suggestions, rather than full expressions

 The delight in reading about Basho in Blyth by DeMott.

I found the first book of R. H. Blyth’s four volume set, Haiku, (originally published between 1949-1952) in a used book store on St. Mark’s Place. If haiku seems no more pertinent to you than, say, heraldry—one more subject about which even an informed person “need not be ashamed to know nothing”[1]—you may be mollified to hear I had an excuse to check Eastern Culture since I was Christmas shopping for a nephew who’s on his way to Japan this spring. The book’s cover—“Oriental brown simple rough peasant cloth”—got me to open “the Blyth Haiku bibles” (pace Allen Ginsberg, Allen Ginsberg). I fell in…

“Plop!”

To quote the last line of “the most famous haiku” with frog-and-pond as translated by Blyth—scholar-gypsy who brought the East to Beats and Salinger (see J.D.’s bow to Blyth in “Seymour, An Introduction”: “…haiku, but senryu, too…can be read with special satisfaction when R. H. Blyth was on them. Blyth is sometimes perilous, naturally, since he’s a highhanded old poem himself, but he’s also sublime.”) Blyth’s scholarship began to come through to Americans in the post-WWII era—when Japan’s crown-prince was another of his tutees and Blyth helped draft Hirohito’s “Declaration of Humanity.”[2] (He prompted the Emperor to refuse divinity and come out as a mortal though not a Christer as General MacArthur—Japan’s “Supreme Public Administrator”—wished.)

Blyth grew up poor in England, the son of a railway clerk. An outlier from the outset, he was a scholarship boy who loved animals, adopted vegetarianism, and did time as a conscientious objector during World War I. He headed East with his first wife in 1924 after graduating from London University, where he’d been recruited to take a job as a professor of English Language and Literature in Korea. He moved on to Japan in 1939 (with his second wife, a Japanese woman he met in Seoul after his first marriage failed). Interned during the war as an enemy alien, he still managed to begin publishing books in English with a Japanese firm, The Hokuseido Press (who remained his publishers through the Sixties). He ended up working with Japanese and American authorities to help ease the transition to peace after 1945.

Let’s skip out of history and let “Mr. Time-less”—to borrow an honorific bestowed on Blyth by a Zen master.[3]—plump for “plop” in Bashô’s famous haiku, which has also been rendered as “A deep resonance” though Blyth skips over that translation even as he tells why other one-word shots won’t do…

The old pond/A frog jumps in—/Plop!

Against this translation it may be urged that “plop” is an un-poetical, rather humorous word. To this I would answer, “Read it over slowly, about a dozen times, and this association will disappear largely.”  Further, it may be said the expression “plop” is utterly different in sound from “mizu no oto.” This is not quite correct. The English “sound of water” is too gentle, suggesting a running stream or brook. The Japanese word “oto” has an onomatopoeic value much nearer to “plop.” Other translations are wide of the mark. “Splash” sounds as if Bashô himself has fallen in. Yone Noguchi’s “List, the water sound,” shows Bashô in graceful pose with finger in air. “Plash,” by Henderson, is also a misuse of words. Anyway, it is lucky for Bashô that he was born a Japanese, because probably not even he could have said it in English. Now we come to the meaning. An English author writes as follows:

“Some scholars maintain that this haiku about the frog is a perfect philosophical comment on the littleness of human life in comparison with the infinite. Such poems are hints, suggestions, rather than full expressions of an idea.”    

No haiku is a philosophical comment. Human life is not little: it is not to be compared with the infinite, whatever that is. Haiku are not hints; they suggest nothing whatever.[4].           https://www.firstofthemonth.org/on-the-road-with-r-h-blyth/

Poets are the ministers and zen masters of intimation and intimacy.

I'd rather be confused by poetry than assured by rhetoric or prose.

It cheers that life is so confusing, that opinion and certitude trip over lumps in rug, bang hip on corner of island in kitchen before hitting head on unforgiving floor.

When I fall I want to fall in love.

It is, after all, Valentine's Day.

Some reference has to be made to flowers.

When I'm knocked unconscious I'd prefer not to see relatives and former acquaintances hovering nearby waiting to greet me into some reunion not worth the time it takes to say near-death or reincarnation.

Enough, (say it),  said.

politics 2026

 give me your wallet!

    whoa...are you robbing me?


hand me your watch!

    no, I won’t.


vote for me!

    sure, what’s your name?


(that was easy)

    (phew, narrowly escaped)

mountain feels him coming

 Headlights down road

Turn into snow bowl

Early arrival, this monk


Will straddle metal into snowcat

Start ascent up steel grouser cleats

To intimate cab with lighted levers


Such good snow this season

Downhill ski runs crisscross

Swooshing joy for the fearless


It is enough for me to live next

Door to this mountain abbey ashram

A non-skier, I walk to toboggan run


Last week’s national championships

Bonfires on frozen pond/lake, 40 mph

Rumbling runs down wood shute 


This Jiyuu (自由, じゆう) finishes first coffee

Turns key in starter, begins solitary

Climb aslant ascent leaving loving ridges


His night office

Horarium of the heart making way

For those coming after

Friday, February 13, 2026

late am i learning you

 Bewith

All these years


The translation of 

Dominus vobiscom


Is really

“May One bewith you”


Of course it is

This way of being 


Bewithed and 

Bewithing 

divide-d'end

 man in prison today

convincing me this

good president exposes


corruption -- not only 

his own but that of all

the traders and traitors


in congress and the court --

the quiet revelation that

public office is a goldmine


picked and panned by clever

law-evaders pretending to be 

looking out for constituents


(he rubbed his tired eyes

Speaks of son also inside

this patrimony of sadness)


I listen to him, he knows

how it is done, how they 

manipulate, going to cash


while pointing fingers

thumbs picking

pockets of saps and suckers

sweeping his simile into bin

 He wondered

What it’s like

To be his toaster


Concluding

He couldn’t

(There you are)


Not me, 

I am my toaster

Consciousness be damned


Give me bread

Lower that lever

Burn, baby, burn


Peanut butter

Strawberry jam

Cup of coffee


You see, consciousness

Has nothing to do

With you


It resides

As crumbs appearing

On cutting board


Just there

The way words are meant

To be, brushed, away

defeat, utterly, overcome

 I used to pray

Now prayer uses me —


I am

Overwhelmed

what happened to him

 Christ watches trump

Sees nothing there

Wonders

Thursday, February 12, 2026

called physiologoi in antiquity, (greek: φυσιολόγοι)

 I first heard the phrase reading psychiatrist Karl Stern who wrote, "All being is nuptial." It was in his book "The Flight from Woman", 1965.

Today, these references. First by Nicolai Berdyaev (1874-1948):

The freedom implicit in the exercise of knowledge receives its illumination from the Logos. But it is also related to Eros. To pursue knowledge without any consciousness of love, merely to seek power, is a form of demonism. It may therefore be affirmed that knowledge is essentially cosmogonic. It should consider reality carefully and examine it conscientiously; for moral pathos is the true inspiration and urge for our quest for truth. The subjective freedom thus generated by the Logos transfigures reality. The nature of knowledge is conjugal; it is both male and female, it is the conjunction of these two principles, the impregnation of the feminine element by virile meaning.” ~ Solitude and Society

The theological doctrine that God created man for His own glory and praise is degrading to man, and degrading to God also…. God as personality does not desire a man over whom He can rule, and who ought to praise Him, but man as personality who answers His call and with whom communion of love is possible.” ~ Slavery and Freedom

Consciousness which exteriorizes and alienates is always slavish consciousness. God the Master, man the slave; the church the master, man the slave; the family the master, man the slave; Nature the master, man the slave; object the master, man-subject the slave. The source of slavery is always objectification, that is to say exteriorization, alienation.” ~ Slavery and Freedom

Man can be a slave to public opinion, a slave to custom, to morals, to judgments and opinions which are imposed by society. It is difficult to overestimate the violence which is perpetrated by the press in our time. The average man of our day holds the opinions and forms the judgments of the newspaper which he reads every morning: it exercises psychological compulsion upon him. And in view of the falsehood and venality of the press, the effects are very terrible as seen in the enslavement of man and his deprivation of freedom of conscience and judgment.” ~ Slavery and Freedom


Men not only need the state and cannot do without the services it renders, but they are seduced by it, they are taken captive by the state, they connect their dreams of sovereignty with it. And there lies the chief evil and a source of human slavery.” ~ Slavery and Freedom

Then by Marguerite Porete (1250-1310):

Marguerite Porete, though she wrote around 700 years ago, has a completely different way of looking at the nuptial metaphor. In The Mirror of Simple Souls she draws a picture of a love relationship between the Soul and God that is completely mutual in both self-giving and satisfaction. In this work Porete creates a dialogue between the soul and a host of characters such as Lady Love, Reason, The Supreme Lady of Peace, and The Spouse of the Soul. In the middle of this dialogue, the Soul comes to Lady Love in utter despondency. She has thought that the love between herself and the Divine was without “Lordship” but has found that she has nothing and the Divine has all. This creates an imbalance in the relationship and the Soul is heartbroken to think that she has nothing to offer to the one she loves. 

Lady Love immediately reassures her that she herself is enough and that her lover is wholly satisfied with exactly what she has to give. In fact, the Divine is happy to give all of Godself in return for the soul’s gift of self. This is a totally different relationship from that which we see in the theology of recent popes and other theologians. In this relationship there are no set roles of “giver” or “receiver,” rather both have their turn in giving and receiving. This is a relationship that allows Marguerite to write of the soul, 

“She swims and flows in joy, without feeling any joy, for she dwells in Joy and Joy dwells in her. She is Joy itself…”

https://www.womensordination.org/blog/2020/03/07/a-mutual-nuptial/ 

We wonder about the soul.

We try to suss what union or unity means in our everyday meander through both solitude and communality. What are the borders? Are we separate? What intercourse or spontaneous generation emerges into itself-reality, what the rational intellect can only interpret as a dualistic cause and effect.

Active in the 6th and 5th centuries BCE, early Greek philosophers, called physiologoi in antiquity (Greek: φυσιολόγοι; in English, physical or natural philosophers), attempted to give natural explanations of phenomena that had previously been ascribed to the agency of the gods.[8] The physiologoi sought the material principle or arche (Greek: ἀρχή) of things, emphasizing the rational unity of the external world and rejecting theological or mythological explanations.[9] 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation

 Are we, as some suggest, mired in illusion fabricated by an anachronistic archaic consciousness that thrives on notions of division and separation? Or as a man in prison conversation said on Monday "We're addicted to divisiveness."

Can we imagine (like Berdyaev) a seeming interspersion, an advaitic non-twoness emerging as itself, not measurable as distinct or divided, but a fluidic swirling appearance of hardly recognizable reality?

In other words (my mother's favorite phrase) the appearance of non-appearance in its true nature, one and the same, within-itself/without-itself, of a piece, might we say, as peace?

Can we say we will never be at peace with the mind that drags us behind it?

Rather, to dwell within mind-itself is to abandon leading or following, resolving to dwell in what leather-worker philosopher from Ellsworth expressed as the true meaning of "anarchist?"

I wonder if he'd have agreed (annoyingly dying a few years ago) with the AI description:

Being an anarchist means believing in a society without rulers, hierarchies, or coercive authority, advocating instead for voluntary cooperation, mutual aid, and individual freedom, often through dismantling the state, capitalism, and other oppressive structures, though specific methods and focus (individual vs. collective) vary. It's a political philosophy opposing all forms of domination, envisioning a self-organized society based on free association and consensus. 
(--search, anarchist)

Nuptiality. Essentially and existentially -- two-become-one. Or, perhaps, one-not-become-two.

Of course wording wears its awkwardness.

Men and women, men and men, women and women, God and humanity, creation and creator, this and that, you and me.

What is there to see? And if wholeness is the sole reality, is there any seeing at all?

Perhaps that's the terror of death for many of us. 

No seeing. 

Nothing other to see. 

Just Being-Within.

As Itself.

Whole and impartial.

¿la verdad realmente libera?

 Lying isn’t new

Truth is difficult


If you want the truth

Embrace the difficult

honestly

Thanks, Abe

Born for

US, today

can of beings

 Withdrawing into

Silent solitude


The hobo fool

Finds odd comfort


Just this side

Of emptiness 

stop

 Lovely sun through window

Cat walks across chest

Western Union message

Open door, now, please

absence of justice

 Listening to attorney general

I cannot find any decency

Any willingness to serve

Anyone not her pal

attribute nothing to it

 I notice

Things 

Falling away


That

I no longer

Care


Falling

Into

Sleep

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

tell everyone just to remember their names

 Poem by William Stafford:

A Message from the Wanderer 

Today outside your prison I stand
and rattle my walking stick: Prisoners, listen;
you have relatives outside. And there are
thousands of ways to escape.

Years ago I bent my skill to keep my
cell locked, had chains smuggled to me in pies,
and shouted my plans to jailers;
but always new plans occurred to me,
or the new heavy locks bent hinges off,
or some stupid jailer would forget
and leave the keys.

Inside, I dreamed of constellations—
those feeding creatures outlined by stars,
their skeletons a darkness between jewels,
heroes that exist only where they are not.

Thus freedom always came nibbling my thought,
just as—often, in light, on the open hills—
you can pass an antelope and not know
and look back, and then—even before you see—
there is something wrong about the grass.
And then you see.

That’s the way everything in the world is waiting.

Now—these few more words, and then I’m
gone: Tell everyone just to remember
their names, and remind others, later, when we
find each other. Tell the little ones
to cry and then go to sleep, curled up
where they can. And if any of us get lost,
if any of us cannot come all the way—
remember: there will come a time when
all we have said and all we have hoped
will be all right.

There will be that form in the grass.

Copyright Credit: William Stafford, “A Message from the Wanderer” from The Way It Is: New & Selected Poems. Copyright © 1998