It's maddening
Sexual predation
so rampant
Maddening
So many
suffer
so maddening
so maddening
so maddening
It's maddening
Sexual predation
so rampant
Maddening
So many
suffer
so maddening
so maddening
so maddening
Once I wanted
To be
A monk
Now
I can’t
Remember why
Not
Wanting
Anything else
Than what I am
A monk
With no why
Truth is an honorable destination
I think the leadership
In Washington is lost
Reading poet Joanne Kyger book of poems, As Ever.
Could not find online poem in book, "12.29 & 30 (Pan as the Son of Penelope)" by Joanne Kyger, and too long to type. But came across this:
Night Palace
"The best thing about the past
is that it's over"
when you die.
you wake up
from the dream
that's your life.
Then you grow up
and get to be post human
in a past that keeps happening
ahead of you
(--Poem by Joanne Kyger, OCTOBER 2003
Learned she was married to Gary Snyder from 1960-65 and wrote alongside the Beats (Ginsburg, Creeley, Kerouac, Whelan).
This from a literary magazine:
In person, Kyger offers wide-ranging and inspired conversation. Through years of practice of poetry and Zen, as well as attending the manners and courtesies of village life in Bolinas, she has managed to compress in pragmatic fashion questions or statements that clear the air in an instant. “I don’t care what someone ‘knows’ or ‘feels,’” she said to me once in conversation about poetry, “I want to know what’s happening.” I repeat this because it impressed me deeply, and because it reveals much that is true of the new narrative forms that came out of the 1960s and ‘70s in and around Bolinas. Particularly, the statement draws attention to Kyger’s own careful, perceptive nature, and her uses of poetry. She exemplifies a faith in the life-long process of self-relation, trusting in the poem and its instantaneous recognition in the projective field articulated by Charles Olson. Unlike Olson, however, she focuses on events and happenings, moving herself out of the way as a kind of recording instrument. Philip Whalen, from whom she learned much too, created a similar ethos of detachment in his work. His finished poems, however, are more like seamless, well-crafted collages from notebooks. They are full of humor and detached observations of diverse physical and creative environments inter-textually stitched to delight and tease readers with exemplary wisdom and bardic aplomb. Kyger’s work by contrast is personally intimate, faithful to specific moments in time and attendant to the many spirits or moods of landscape. The real difference, perhaps, is the frame of attention, and the spirits guiding it. Whalen’s genius for quotation and for extending the context of the poem contrasts starkly with Kyger’s bright and socially centered attention to the immediate context of composition, as it is known through her words rather than through the quotes of others.
^
Her attention to place makes her an intimate observer of every day life in her beloved Bolinas. Her engagement with organic life processes is mirrored by the visual construction of her poems on the page, where lines often are set out into the space of the page rather than stacked along the left-hand margin. In this sense visually she is close to Pound and Williams, using the page as a kind of painting or glyph for the ease and pleasure of the eye. “I saw the page as some kind of tapestry and voice glyph,” she said in a 1997 interview,[12] echoing concerns for the poem that have been with her from her first book, The Tapestry and the Web. “When you move your line to the right, the lesser the impact of the line, the voice. The whole movement and rhythm on the page give us instruction as to voice and phrasing and import of what’s going on.” These concerns for her own creative environments reveal an openness to phenomena, an openness that withholds judgment in order to experience the moment through several perspectives. She is adamant too in stressing that anything can become part of a person’s poetic practice. “Your dreams are important,” she said, “your humorous life is important, your cooking life is important, your friendships, the dialogues you assume, the news that comes from within, the news that comes from out there. There’s such a wide variety of ‘things’ that go on. It’s important not to get stuck on any one of these as being the ‘I’ that writes. Being able to report, as it were, from all these areas of life and see that they’re equally ‘valid’ and ‘important.’ Nothing is more or less important than anything else. An egalitarian sense of what it’s like to be a human. What being alive is like.
—from Joanne Kyger and the Narrative of Every Day, by Dale Smith, Jacket Magazine, October 2007
Today, for we medievalists, Elizabeth of Portugal.
(Elisabet in Catalan, Isabel in Aragonese, Portuguese and Spanish; 4 January 1271 – 4 July 1336), also known as Elizabeth of Aragon, was Queen of Portugal from 1282 to 1325 as the wife of King Denis. She is venerated as a saint in the Catholic Church, under the name Saint Elizabeth of Portugal or Queen Saint Elizabeth (Rainha Santa Isabel in Portuguese).
After Denis' death in 1325, Elizabeth retired to the monastery of the Poor Clare nuns, now known as the Monastery of Santa Clara-a-Velha (which she had founded in 1314) in Coimbra. She joined the Third Order of St. Francis, devoting the rest of her life to the poor and sick in obscurity.[8][4] During the great famine in 1293, she donated flour from her cellars to the starving in Coimbra. She was also known for being modest in her dress and humble in conversation, for providing lodging for pilgrims, distributing small gifts, paying the dowries of poor girls, and educating the children of poor nobles. She was a benefactor of various hospitals (Coimbra, Santarém and Leiria) and of religious projects (such as the Trinity Convent in Lisbon, chapels in Leiria and Óbidos, and the cloister in Alcobaça).[10]
She was called to act once more as a peacemaker in 1336, when Afonso IV marched his troops against King Alfonso XI of Castile, his nephew, to whom he had married his daughter Maria, and who had neglected and ill-treated her. In spite of age and weakness, the Queen-dowager insisted on hurrying to Estremoz, where the two kings' armies were drawn up. She again stopped the fighting and caused terms of peace to be arranged. But the exertion brought on her final illness.[4] As soon as her mission was completed, she took to her bed with a fever from which she died on 4 July, in the castle of Estremoz. She earned the title of Peacemaker on account of her efficacy in solving disputes.[
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_of_Portugal#:~:text=During%20the%20great%20famine%20in,the%20children%20of%20poor%
Ah, the 13th and 14th centuries!
An elder used the word Wankelmut the other day -- fickleness.
Some German synonyms: Variabilität, Veränderlichkeit, Flüchtigkeit, Wandlungsfähigkeit, Unstetigkeit, Unbeständigkeit, Flatterhaftigkeit, Launenhaftigkeit, Wandelbarkeit, Sprunghaftigkeit, Lebhaftigkeit
And English definitions of fickleness
Noun:1
changeability, especially as regards one's loyalties or affections.
“the fickleness of youth”
Synonyms:
capriciousness, changeability, variability, volatility, vacillation, fitfulness, irregularity, tendency to blow hot and cold, disloyalty, undependability, inconstancy, instability, unsteadiness, infidelity, unfaithfulness, faithlessness, irresolution, flightiness, giddinesss, kittishness, impulsiveness, unpredictability, unpredictableness, randomness, technical: lability, literary: mutability.
It's the ancient tension identified by Parmenides and Heraclitus -- Being: the changeless; Becoming: change. One or the other, they argued.
Up through Plato (/ˈpleɪtoʊ/ PLAY-toh; Ancient Greek: Πλάτων , Plátōn; born c. 428–423 BC, died 348/347 BC); Aristotle[A] (Ancient Greek: Ἀριστοτέλης, romanized: Aristotélēs;[B] 384–322 BC); Augustine of Hippo (/ɔːˈɡʌstɪn/ aw-GUST-in, US also /ˈɔːɡəstiːn/ AW-gə-steen;[22] Latin: Aurelius Augustinus Hipponensis; 13 November 354 – 28 August 430)[23] ; Thomas Aquinas (/əˈkwaɪnəs/ ⓘ ə-KWY-nəs; Italian: Tommaso d'Aquino, lit. 'Thomas of Aquino'; c. 1225 – 7 March 1274); to Martin Heidegger[a] (26 September 1889 – 26 May 1976); Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (/ˈvɪtɡənʃtaɪn, -staɪn/ VIT-gən-s(h)tyne;[5] Austrian German: [ˈluːdvɪç ˈjoːsɛf ˈjoːhan ˈvɪtɡn̩ʃtaɪn]; 26 April 1889 – 29 April 1951); Sir Karl Raimund Popper (28 July 1902 – 17 September 1994); Thomas Samuel Kuhn (/kuːn/; July 18, 1922 – June 17, 1996); Alfred North Whitehead (15 February 1861 – 30 December 1947); Bernardo Kastrup (born 21 October 1974); among many others -- who've thought about the being/becoming tension. (Cf. Wikipedia)
And that does not include the ancient and modern thinking out of China, Japan, India, etc.
Here's what I think.
Literally, "here."
Think about what is here. Feel what is here. Let what is here speak to and listen to you. Converse what is here.
Sit with this for a while. Sit with that.
When you stand up, try not to fall. Bruises and scrapes will follow if you fall.
Give me liberty or give me death. (Orator)
I will give you both. (Creator)
(Mulling)
I’ll have a double chocolate donut instead.
dog to go to pond
his breathing is labored
time for cooling
glad he has good mistress
Maybe a hotdog
some baked beans
Ginger ale
Yogurt and rhubarb kompot
Nothing special
A Saturday
Daddy has been
Unfaithful
He embarrasses
The family
And yet and yet
Sunday will dawn
Enjoyed listening to Christopher Hitchens.
Enjoyed listening to Thich Nhat Hanh.
Enjoyed listening to Thomas Keating.
Call me old fashioned
Intelligence and articulateness
Are pleasing companions
I suppose joy is the unquestioning appreciation of life and the world as it is.
To give up opinions and preferences is probably the clearest and safest way to live.
Perhaps to see the good or the possibility of good in everything.
To allow the possibility that, at core, everything is love.
I will walk that circle, I will try, as my Native friend says, to walk in peace. ("Wlakámigenokan ôlósamek)
Saying "walk in peace" in the Western Abenaki language (spoken by the Abenaki people of the Northeast) combines specific verbs and adverbs to express the idea of living in harmony. In this language, peace is more than the absence of violence; it is an active state of tranquility and "making good kin" with others and the land. [1, 2, 3]
Here is how you say it:
"Wlakámigenokan ôlósamek"
Breakdown of the phrase:
Wlakámigenoka: To make peace.
Ôlósamek: To walk or to continue along. [1, 2]
I’ve not grown tired
looking at mountain across road
I’ve never found Jesus or God
If you remember my name
Try not to pronounce it
I’ve gone incognito
I do not stand on capital steps
Calling for impeachment
Only an Air Force hero does that
I am an imposter
Disguised and not distinguished
Someone without much courage
I would never say “Impeach the guy!”
Never call for him to go to prison —
Never wish him ill-health
I am a civilised imposter
I recognize an authentic
Historical anomaly, a one-off
Someone who was in our time
So damaged he takes down the country
By sheer disingenuous dangerous ignorance
And we
Got to get to
See it happen
* Human stupidity
is nothing
to laugh at.
Scholars generally agree the Vimalakirtinirdesa Sutra text was composed between the 1st century BCE and the early 3rd century CE.
If you want to go to the pure land,
Then purify your mind.
When your mind is pure,
Then whatever you see will be pure
And wherever you go
You will find the Buddha realm.
-- from Vimalakirtinirdesa Sutra
The bodhisattva Mañjuśrī (conventionally understood as the embodiment of supreme wisdom) is persuaded by the Buddha to visit Vimalakīrti, albeit with some difficulty. Vimalakīrti miraculously transforms his apparently narrow and humble abode into a vast cosmic palace, thus creating enough space for the throng Mañjuśrī has brought with him. Vimalakīrti explains his illness in spiritual terms, equating it with the fundamental existential malaise of all sentient beings. According to this discourse, the true cure for all ills is also spiritual, and involves the achievement of states of non-self and non-dualism. wikipedia, Vimalakirti Sutra
In the VIMALAKIRTI NIRDESA SUTRA, Translated by Robert A. F. Thurman, this fragment from chapter 4:
Then, the Buddha said to the bodhisattva Maitreya, "Maitreya, go to the Licchavi Vimalakirti to inquire about his illness."
"'Therefore, Maitreya, do not fool and delude these deities! No one abides in, or regresses from, enlightenment. Maitreya, you should introduce these deities to the repudiation of all discriminative constructions concerning enlightenment.
"'Enlightenment is perfectly realized neither by the body nor by the mind. Enlightenment is the eradication of all marks. Enlightenment is free of presumptions concerning all objects. Enlightenment is free of the functioning of all intentional thoughts. Enlightenment is the annihilation of all convictions. Enlightenment is free from all discriminative constructions.
Enlightenment is free from all vacillation, mentation, and agitation. Enlightenment is not involved in any commitments. Enlightenment is the arrival at detachment, through freedom from all habitual attitudes. The ground of enlightenment is the ultimate realm. Enlightenment is realization of reality. Enlightenment abides at the limit of reality.
Enlightenment is without duality, since therein are no minds and no things. Enlightenment is equality, since it is equal to infinite space.
"'Enlightenment is unconstructed, because it is neither born nor destroyed, neither abides nor undergoes any transformation. Enlightenment is the complete knowledge of the thoughts, deeds, and inclinations of all living beings. Enlightenment is not a door for the six media of sense.
Enlightenment is unadulterated, since it is free of the passions of the instinctually driven succession of lives.
Enlightenment is neither somewhere nor nowhere, abiding in no location or dimension.
Enlightenment, not being contained in anything, does not stand in reality. Enlightenment is merely a name and even that name is unmoving. Enlightenment, free of abstention and undertaking, is energyless. There is no agitation in enlightenment, as it is utterly pure by nature. Enlightenment is radiance, pure in essence. Enlightenment is without subjectivity and completely without object.
Enlightenment, which penetrates the equality of all things, is undifferentiated. Enlightenment, which is not shown by any example, is incomparable. Enlightenment is subtle, since it is extremely difficult to realize. Enlightenment is all-pervasive, as it has the nature of infinite space.
Enlightenment cannot be realized, either physically or mentally. Why? The body is like grass, trees, walls, paths, and hallucinations. And the mind is immaterial, invisible, baseless, and unconscious.'
"Lord, when Vimalakirti had discoursed thus, two hundred of the deities in that assembly attained the tolerance of birthlessness. As for me, Lord, I was rendered speechless. Therefore, I am reluctant to go to that good man to inquire about his illness."
https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Reln260/Vimalakirti.htm
It’s lucky I am not enlightened.
I stumble around in the dark.
My illness is mundane and uncomplicated.
I’m comfortable with no arrival and no departure.
While researching Vimalakirti I am listening to a book.
The book is After (A Doctor Explores What Near Death Experiences Reveal About Life and The Beyond), (2021) by Psychiatrist Bruce Greyson MD.
(About which more later.)
I listen to birds between Ragged and Bald Mountains,
A slight breeze --
This first of July.
Yeah, maybe something like this:
Using the Tralfamadorian passivity of fate, Pilgrim learns to overlook death and the shock involved with death. He claims the Tralfamadorian philosophy on death to be his most important lesson:
The most important thing I learned on Tralfamadore was that when a person dies he only appears to die. He is still very much alive in the past, so it is very silly for people to cry at his funeral. All moments, past, present, and future, always have existed, always will exist. ... When a Tralfamadorian sees a corpse, all he thinks is that the dead person is in bad condition in that particular moment, but that the same person is just fine in plenty of other moments. Now, when I myself hear that somebody is dead, I simply shrug and say what the Tralfamadorians say about dead people, which is "So it goes."[23]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaughterhouse-Five
That’s probably it.
That and war’s utter absurdity and idiotic cruelty.
I’ve seen photos
The universe is very very big —
How silly earthlings are
Give trump all the money he craves,
I’ve seen his photos
He is very very small
If I were
a poet
I’d write poetry
But I am a fool
so I write
foolishness
Uno sciocco e il suo spirito
si separano presto
(a fool and his wit
are soon separated)
I sit
staring at nothing
these days
no noise
going nowhere
a lethargy of stillness
nothing to emulate
just debris
a scatter of fallen things
newspapers, magazines
cat-clawed boxes
a bag of pistachios
having lost my taste
I’m content
ただここに座っているだけ
Tada koko ni suwatte iru
(just
sitting here)
If
God
Then
Creation
If no
God
Then
Decoration
Be wary of
Decorous delusion
If lunacy
then great sorrow
άσεμνος, αναξιοπρεπής
indecent, undignified
an American
presidency
One of three tonight at practice:
A Ritual to Read to Each Other
If you don't know the kind of person I am
and I don't know the kind of person you are
a pattern that others made may prevail in the world
and following the wrong god home we may miss our star.
For there is many a small betrayal in the mind,
a shrug that lets the fragile sequence break
sending with shouts the horrible errors of childhood
storming out to play through the broken dike.
And as elephants parade holding each elephant's tail,
but if one wanders the circus won't find the park,
I call it cruel and maybe the root of all cruelty
to know what occurs but not recognize the fact.
And so I appeal to a voice, to something shadowy,
a remote important region in all who talk:
though we could fool each other, we should consider—
lest the parade of our mutual life get lost in the dark.
For it is important that awake people be awake,
or a breaking line may discourage them back to sleep;
the signals we give — yes or no, or maybe —
should be clear: the darkness around us is deep.
— Poem by William E. Stafford (1914-1993)
The joy of poetry!