Fifty years ago Thomas Merton wrote about 2017:
Merton introduced me to Robert Lax whose lifestyle and poetry remain foundational and interesting.
https://www.facebook.com/poetlax/
The problem as I see it is no longer merely political or economic or legal or what have you (it was never merely that).
It is a spiritual and psychological problem of a society which has developed too fast and too far for the psychic capacities of its members, who can no longer cope with their inner hostilities and destructiveness. They can no longer really manage their lives in a fully reasonable and human way - only by resort to extreme and possibly destructive maneuvers.
A nuclear arms race.
A race to get on the moon.
A stupid war in Asia that cannot be won by either side.
An affluent economy depending on built-in obsolescence and the ever increasing consumption of more goodies than anyone can comfortably consume.
A bored, ambivalent over-stimulation of violence and sex.
We are living in a society which for all its unquestionable advantages and all its fantastic ingenuity just does not seem to be able to provide people with lives that are fully human and fully real.
There are wonderful people in it, and it is a marvel we are not ten times crazier than we already are, but we have to fact the fact that we live in a pretty sick culture. Now if in this sick society, where there are a lot of very scared, very upset, very unrealistic people who feel themselves more and more violently threatened, everyone starts buying guns and preparing to shoot each other up (remember the fuss about the gun in the fallout shelter in 1962), we are going to have an unparalleled mess. The result may eventually be that people will decide that the only way to maintain some semblance of order will be the creation of a semifascist state with storm troopers and, yes, concentration camps.
(-Thomas Merton, from an essay, “The Hot Summer of Sixty-Seven”, in a collection of Merton essays by William Shannon, “Passion for Peace". pp. 293-294)At Sunday Evening Practice we listened to Pema Chodron tell the story of the youth (10-11yrs old) Chôgyam Trungpa’s first encounter with a fork, and his being told that he will one day teach the people who use such an implement and he would find they’d be more interested in remaining asleep than waking up. (He would later say, “Enlightenment is ego’s ultimate disappointment.”)http://fatherlouie.blogspot.com, beth cioffolett
I was reminded of the time I spent with Fr. Adrian Van Kaam in 1966 at a 3-4 day seminar in Portsmouth NH.
Adrian van Kaam was a Dutch Roman Catholic priest, a psychologist and a contemporary of Corrie ten Boom. Though they most likely never met, van Kaam did within the Roman Catholic community what Corrie ten Boom did in the Protestant community to assist Jews in escaping the Nazi tyranny of World War II. He himself was caught behind enemy lines during the Dutch Hunger Winter of 1944. During this time, people from across denominational lines came to him for spiritual counsel. As he sought God’s guidance for ministering to people under horrible circumstances, the seeds were planted which eventually blossomed into a comprehensive model of spiritual formation that he later entitled Formative Spirituality. His model is oceanic in breadth and depth and increasing numbers of non-Catholics are benefiting from his scholarly work. ...
This journey into the detailed metatheory and intricate metalanguage of the van Kaamian model has provided me with a comprehensive model for integrating Christianity and psychology. The model integrates the anthropology and the science of formation along with the theology of formation. Van Kaam’s model is informed by the pre and post-reformation writings of the Christian spiritual masters. The time it has taken to revisit the thinking of van Kaam and Muto has borne fruit for me personally and professionally beyond anything I would have imagined and I would like to share some of his concepts with you in the hope that they will stimulate your thinking and complement your work and perhaps motivate some readers to pursue training in van Kaam’s model.
The concept of “detached curiosity and formative receptivity” is introduced by van Kaam in his work Religion and Personality. It has been helpful for my clients to learn to detach from both external events and internal responses that are troubling to them. Van Kaam encourages people to develop a detached curiosity as if interviewing themselves to better understand their reactions and internal dissonance. Detached curiosity fosters an appraisal of the meaning of those exterior and interior events. Formative receptivity is an attitude that helps a person recognize opportunities for spiritual formation when dissonance or a loss of peace identify an area of one’s character that God might want to transform or reform in his or her life. Van Kaam offers a detailed “appraisal process” for people to intelligently guide themselves to a place where they open themselves to the transforming intervention whereby God forms their Christian character. In a very pastoral way, van Kaam brings people to a place where they, “appreciatively abandon themselves to the Mystery” of God’s formative action.
Another helpful van Kaamian concept is that of a “foundational life form.” This term relates to the idea that God had us in His mind and that He loved us before He created the world (Ephesians 1:4-6; Psalm 139:13-16, NLT). He made each of us a unique design (form) of the image of God. Of course, we know that the form that God had of us in His mind was deformed by the fall. Now, van Kaam encourages believers to see that God is in the process of reforming them or transforming them back into the form of the image of God which He originally intended us to be and this constitutes the purpose of spiritual formation.
(--from, The Formative Spirituality Model of Adrian van Kaam, by William Roth, Th.M., Psy.D. He is an Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Loma Linda University School of Medicine). http://www.christianpsych.org/wp_scp/the-formative-spirituality-model-of-adrian-van-kaam/The experience of those four days with Van Kaam in a Portsmouth school, sitting on playground eating lunch in circle of formative souls, and meeting a Sister of Assumption, Jo-Ann, learning that psychological integrity was isomorphic (my term) with traditional spirituality, was a subterranean foundation for the many years of confusion and inquiry, practice and conversation to follow.
Merton introduced me to Robert Lax whose lifestyle and poetry remain foundational and interesting.
https://www.facebook.com/poetlax/
Perhaps Sandoz in Russell’s The Sparrow, and Gene Pitney initial singing -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5J_QoDrNhNo (”Only Love Can Break a Heart” is the title of a popular song from 1962, performed by the American singer-songwriter Gene Pitney. The song was written by Hal David (words) and Burt Bacharach (music) and appears on Pitney’s second album Only Love Can Break a Heart., Wikipedia) -- reveal that a broken heart might be the signature and curious gift of God and love.
It is one of the gifts I’m willing to return to giver. (Disambiguation.) I am not a good receiver.
Perhaps the shape and discourse of contemporary political and social culture is a coarsened reminder that we are not well-formed nor well-versed in the integration of spirituality and psychological integrality.
We are ill-behaved brats shouting our wants in crowded places. We believe our half-baked ideologies are balm for tortured psyches crying out for narcissistic satisfaction.
We go on.
7
after an
hour
he rolls
in his
lines
teaches
me two
words
in the
romany
tongue
for ‘no
fish’
(in the
plural)
(--from poem, Kalymnos: November 29, 1968BY ROBERT LAX) https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/poems/58583/kalymnos-november-29-1968
My love for that dear soeur d’assumption, begun summer 1966, never diminished.
She died this past November.
Some flowers do not disappear from the heart.


