Mostly I remember Richard Burton and Peter O’Toole on horseback (Thomas à Beckett and King Henry II) on a beach discussing the absurd fate landing on them and their friendship in a political time.
Now is my way clear, now is the meaning plain:
Temptation shall not come in this kind again.
The last temptation is the greatest treason:
To do the right deed for the wrong reason.(--T.S. Eliot's Murder in the Cathedral)
The awkward calculus of ethical and moral clarity in a troubled time weighs on the human heart. Every assassin somewhere believes that are doing the right thing. The world is shocked at their action. Commentators endlessly discuss the rationale, the mental illness, the antagonistic motivations for their murderous act. Sides are taken. If he is handsome, a mythology forms. If foreign, a renewed hatred arises.
Beckett is murdered in the cathedral. The troublesome priest has been rid. Henry submits his back for the lash. He is penitent. But he is king. He rules on.
Human history is an unsatisfactory thing. Justice is seldom the outcome of dispute and political maneuvering. The cunning and clever, i.e. the rich and powerful, seldom are held accountable for despicable acts and cruel behavior.
It seems to go that way.
Our fate, if you will.
If you are a fatalist.
I prefer to think of it as simple, uncomplicated ignorance. Side-skirting the clamor to label bad behavior “evil,” I prefer to see it as a deficient heart and a disinterested mind.
I begin to sense that the inner creates the outer. Then, if maturation continues, the inner becomes the outer. (Our mythology of the christian incarnation follows this process.)
To give the benefit of the doubt, I imagine when our evangelical fundamentalist friends blithely ask if I’ve accepted Christ as my personal lord and savior, they are asking from a deep unconscious place whether I understand that unless the clear and undivided inner wholeness that centers all of creation is seen and accepted, the outer expression of the world will remain and be the chaotic divisive confusion of ego-fractured separation and unfeeling dominance it is and has been since its origin.
“Christ,” in this mythology, is that which ‘saves’ us from the delusion of hostile difference and cruel indifference. Christ is the manifestation (some say in human form) of what might be called loving wholeness in particular expression purposed to heal the illusion of fragmentation and to assist in effectuating harmonious peace and attentive presence encouraging meaningful interconnection and compassion amid and within all creation.
The shorthand for this might be -- to take away sin.
If we were to take away institutional hubris and political machination, is “Christ” that which is meant to guide humanity (vide all creation) through chaos and despair into harmony, stability, and peace?
The christ reality, rather than being the proprietory patent of institution and church management, is open source intercommunion of all being, all beings, seeking nourishing existence and loving service one unto the other.
The wrong reason is to have everyone join your belief system. The right deed is to allow love to appear in the inner and outer world on its own, in its own way.


