If I were any
More depressed
Than I am
I’d be my own
Obituary written
On rice paper
Pretending to be
Haiku brushstroke
By deceased artist
If I were any
More depressed
Than I am
I’d be my own
Obituary written
On rice paper
Pretending to be
Haiku brushstroke
By deceased artist
Ekaterina Belova (Russian, b. 1988). Monk (2018, oil on canvas).
every time a guy
on chopper barrels by
all I can think of is
a fat man in unkempt hair
farting in marble and wood
hallway trying to make
the toilet before his rear end
explodes in his half-ass down
dung-arees ten seconds
too late, his girlfriend
hoisting a bottle of cheer
tossing her hair
where he ain’t -- (on
other hand, he might just be
a loud annoyingly sound)
some people have to loudly
let you know they’re passing by --
wheelies, horns, taunts, skid marks
while the rest of us
wonder what we’ve done
to be so unheard, so invisible
This morning in prison, poet Xavier Villaurrutia (1903--1950, Mexico):
Nocturne: Fear / Nocturno miedo
Everything lives at night in secret doubt:
silence and sound, place and time.
Asleep unmoving or sleepwalking awake,
nothing can be done for that secret dread.
And it's useless to close your eyes in the shadows,
to sink them in sleep so they’ll not keep seeing,
for in the hardening shadows, the cave of dreams,
the same nocturnal light will wake you again.
Then, with the shuffle of the suddenly woken,
aimlessly, pointlessly, you start walking.
Night spills its mysteries over you,
and something tells you that to die is to wake up.
In the shadows of a deserted street, on a wall,
in the deep purple mirror of loneliness, who
hasn’t seen himself on the way to or from some encounter,
and not felt the fear and wretchedness and fatal doubt?
The fear of being nothing but an empty body
that anybody -- I or anyone else -- could occupy,
and the wretchedness of watching yourself, alive,
and the doubt that it is -- it is not -- real.
(--poem by Xavier Villaurrutia, in The Oxford Book of Latin American Poetry, a bilingual anthology, edited by Cecilia Vicuña and Ernesto Livon-Grossman, 2009)
We’d been talking about economics, migration, healthcare and insurance juggling, and how no real change will come because everyone thinks they will someday become rich.
One of the men said a group of them watched the final episodes of season five of “The Chosen.”
“Grown men, prisoners,” he said, “cried.”
Nobody thinks the revolution is at hand. Nobody believes there’s much or anything to be done about inequity and authoritarianism.
That’s when Villaurrutia came to the conversation.
Poets have an annoying habit of laying down their hand in a poker game while everyone is looking at them -- and, whether a winning or losing hand, riveting our attention.
Looking down corridors
Open office doors
Paper scraps on floor
No one there
Ghost building
Empty, desolate
Diogenes walks
His extinguished
Lantern abandoned
There are no honest
Men or women there
A desolate congress
Dystopia is voted in
Celebration travels
Home with bloody knives
Outside building
Machine guns point
At empty square
No one comes
The people have
Gone to coast, to boats
Some reach for book
Words, words, where
Once truth was carried
Man from Somalia
Says he’s going back
To homeland where cow’s
Milk is more reliable
Than American heart’s
Broken shards of promise
Cosmotheandric
encorporation
is incarnation
an anthropomorphic
apotheosis of
emergent reality
Minnesota buried assassinated lawgiver, her husband, their dog.
The governor was there for the grieving.
The president indicated he didn’t care.
"Why would I call him? I could call and say, ‘Hi, how you doing?’ The guy doesn’t have a clue," Trump said, referring to Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who was the vice presidential contender facing off against Trump's ticket last year. "He’s a mess. So I could be nice and call, but why waste time?” https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-says-wont-call-gov-tim-walz-minnesota-shootings-mess-rcna213432
I do. I care. Don’t you?
My prayers for the speaker, her husband, their dog. The people of Minnesota. Their Governor.
Shame on that other guy. The guy with no class, no heart. No care but for his ego, his billfold, his arrogant cruelty.
Thinking about contemporary matters, it arises that something is coming to an end and something else is emerging.
Whether what is ending or that which is emerging is beneficial or deleterious to our world, humanity, all life and cosmos itself -- is up for consideration and debate.
One, I suspect, could hope. Or, abandoning hope (as Dante suggested we do entering hell) we could embrace something else. Let’s see what name we give that.
SPIEGEL: Fine. Now the question naturally arises: Can the individual man in any way still influence this web of fateful circumstance? Or, indeed, can philosophy influence it? Or can both together influence it, insofar as philosophy guides the individual, or several individuals, to a determined action?
Heidegger: If I may answer briefly, and perhaps clumsily, but after long reflection: philosophy will be unable to effect any immediate change in the current state of the world. This is true not only of philosophy but of all purely human reflection and endeavor. Only a god can save us. The only possibility available to us is that by thinking and poetizing we prepare a readiness for the appearance of a god, or for the absence of a god in [our] decline, insofar as in view of the absent god we are in a state of decline.27
SPIEGEL: Is there a correlation between your thinking and the emergence of this god? Is there here in your view a causal connection? Do you feel that we can bring a god forth by our thinking?
Heidegger: We can not bring him forth by our thinking. At best we can awaken a readiness to wait [for him].
SPIEGEL: But can we help?
Heidegger: The first help might be the readying of this readiness. It is not through man that the world can be what it is and how it is -- but also not without man. In my view, this goes together with the fact that what I call "Being" (that long traditional, highly ambiguous, now worn-out word) has need of man in order that its revelation, its appearance as truth, and its [various] forms may come to pass. The essence of technicity I see in what I call "pos-ure" (Ge-Sull), an often ridiculed and perhaps awkward expression.28 To say that pos-ure holds sway means that man is posed, enjoined and challenged by a power that becomes manifest in the essence of technicity -- a power that man himself does not control. Thought asks no more than this: that it help us achieve this insight. Philosophy is at an end. (--"Only a God Can Save Us": The Spiegel Interview (1966), with Martin Heidegger, published five days after his death in 1976 )
("Encorporation" is an archaic form of "incorporation". It means to unite something into a whole, to include something as part of something larger, or to form something into a legal corporation. It is essentially an older spelling or usage of the word "incorporate”.)
The prefix "en-" generally means "in," "into," or "cause to be." It can be used to transform nouns and adjectives into verbs, often indicating a state of being or a process of entering or being placed within something. For example, "encase" means to put something in a case, and "endanger" means to put something at risk. (--AI)
The 20th century’s great philosopher, Martin Heidegger, said: \"Most thought-provoking is that we are still not thinking – not even yet, although the state of the world is becoming constantly more thought-provoking.\" (What is Called Thinking? p. 4) For us, thinking is traditionally thought to be \"rationality\", \"reason\", \"judgement\”. Heidegger, somewhat provocatively, says: \"[M]an today is in flight from thinking.\" (Discourse on Thinking p. 45)
Not only do we not think; human beings are actively avoiding thinking. For Heidegger, all the scientific work today, all the research and development, all the political machinations and posings, even contemporary philosophy, represents a flight from thinking. \"[P]art of this flight is that man will neither see nor admit it. Man today will even flatly deny this flight from thinking. He will assert the opposite. He will say – and quite rightly – that there were at no time such far-reaching plans, so many inquiries in so many areas, research carried on as passionately as today. Of course.\" (Discourse on Thinking 45)
And
\"The answer to the question \"What is called thinking?\" is, of course, a statement, but not a proposition that could be formed into a sentence with which the question can be put aside as settled…The question cannot be settled, now or ever…Thinking itself is a way. We respond to the way only by remaining underway.\" (Heidegger: What is Called Thinking?)
\"Just as it is with bats’ eyes in respect of daylight, so it is with our mental vision in respect of those things which are by nature most apparent.\" Aristotle (Metaphysics Ch. I, Bk 2, 993b)
\"The conditions of the possibility of experience in general are at the same time conditions of the possibility of the objects of experience.\" Kant (Critique of Pure Reason, A 158, B 197)
(--freom Heidegger’s What Is Called Thinking? (Philosophical Archive)
Somewhat akin to Lao Tzu’s Tao-te-Ching (The Way and its Power), “Thinking itself is a way.”
And there’s a backdoor to Heidegger’s words for me. And that is his use of the word “itself.”
Here’s my re-accentuation: Thinking “Itself” is a way. “Itself” is, for me, what has traditionally been called “God.” Hence, according to Heideggerian emphasis, “The question cannot be settled, now or ever.”
The “Itself,” or whatever is considered to be “Itself, ” is infinite, eternal, and omnipresent. In popular parlance -- there’s no end to it, who knows where it begins?
When we “think” -- if we were to begin to think -- we would begin to encorporate that which is beyond capability of being encapsulated in thought. It would entail encorporation of Being and Becoming, One’s body and one’s body, wayfaring underway, journeying with no known destination.
This is referred to as poetic thinking.
Martin Heidegger begins his lecture ‘… Poetically Man Dwells …’ by denying poetry is a marginal practice whose imaginings are ‘mere fancies and illusions’. ‘[T]he poetic’, he states, is not ‘merely an ornament and bonus added on to dwelling’. On the contrary, Heidegger boldly claims that poetry is the source of all human dwelling on earth: ‘[…] poetry first causes dwelling to be dwelling. Poetry is what really lets us dwell.’ (--Poetic measures of architecture: Martin Heidegger’s ‘…Poetically Man Dwells…’Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 September 2014)
Poetry really lets us dwell. It assists allowing thinking into being (Being). That which is being created assists that which is coming-to-be and that which is there (DaSein) to dwell, as one, where, how, and when they are where, how, and when they are.
What is poetic thinking?
I define poetic thinking as the transforming power in the interaction of the form of life and the form of language that acts when a subject constitutes itself in a creative and dialogical way, transforming the ways we feel and think, in short: the way we perceive the world.Against the backdrop of the anthropological question, that is, what does it mean to be human?, in the German tradition of philosophical and historical anthropology, poetic thinking builds on two approaches:
a) Thinking language: that is my translation of the German Sprachdenken or the French pensĂ©e du langage. The fact that English does not normally allow for this transitive use of the verb ‘to think’ is already indicating a conceptual problem: we are lacking concepts to think the functioning of language – I want to stress that thinking is done in language. Thinking language has the fundamental belief that language has a cognitive value; it is, as Wilhelm von Humboldt formulated, ’the labour of the mind’, die Arbeit des Geistes. In order to make the world our conscious world (which is often the definition of the human world), we need language. Languages are worldviews, Weltansichten – again Humboldt.
Society is organised in the medium of language, all social relations, including with ourselves. Human life is inconceivable without language. Language is meaning-making and meaning is not exclusively within the sign but in what Henri Meschonnic calls rhythm or the continuousness of language – language patterning and sound are an important aspect of language that needs to be taken into account in our meaning-making processes. We have to think in terms of a serial semantics and of a language-body continuity.
b) Dialogical thinking: by this, I refer to a predominantly German-Jewish tradition, in my view best developed in Martin Buber’s dialogical principle. This is based on the I-You-relationship which – rarely – happens in a moment of encounter, unfolding a sphere of the in-between, in which the subject does not perceive the other as an object but merging with the other in the sphere of a subject-subject-relationship. This is opposed to the everyday I-It-relationship when we deal with the world as outer objects. However, it is particularly the dialogical I-You moments which are fundamental for our being in the world.
Throwing off mooring-lines and dock-lines -- let’s listen for the word coming to sound -- let’s be underway!
I’m sitting down
To rest
My heart is sad
And tired
Congress, Supreme
Court, president
Dark skies
Worrisome future
It is feast of
Sacred Heart
(Is it still
Beating?)
Antonio Gramsci popularized it, “but it seems Romain Rolland, the French writer who won the Nobel Prize in literature in 1915, actually said it first.” i.e. “Pessimism of the mind, optimism of the will.”
"You must realize that I am far from feeling beaten…it seems to me that… a man out to be deeply convinced that the source of his own moral force is in himself — his very energy and will, the iron coherence of ends and means — that he never falls into those vulgar, banal moods, pessimism and optimism. My own state of mind synthesises these two feelings and transcends them: my mind is pessimistic, but my will is optimistic. Whatever the situation, I imagine the worst that could happen in order to summon up all my reserves and will power to overcome every obstacle.”
(--Antonio Gramsci, also cf a Letter from Prison, December 1929)
In prison this morning, without mentioning either Rolland or Gramsci, the conversation centered on the origin of one’s moral source.
Native man told story of man lingering at door of death, friend of family, and the concern two close people had about costs and responsibility. He said it was unsettling to hear their focus while the man was needing to finish his journey with care and respect and dignity.
So he prayed. He spoke to the Creator for wisdom to represent the gratitude needed to convey to the family members their proper task at this time. He sent a long thought following his time of prayer. They thanked him.
Earlier, man from Somalia spoke about Yoga Nidra.
Yoga nidra, also known as ‘yogic sleep’, is a simplified form of an ancient tantric relaxation technique. The most general description of the practice is that it combines guided mental imagery with a specific yoga posture called Shavasana (or “corpse pose”). (--from The Origin and Clinical Relevance of Yoga Nidra)
We read David Whyte’s poem “The Old Interior’s Angel” and spent some time on the lines --
Finally, facing defeat
and about to go back
the way I came
to meet the others.
Prison is not easy.
The task of co-existing with so many different men and so many demanding situations. Sometimes just to describe the alleyways and thoroughfares of daily travels (travails?) in a maximum security setting is an invitation to see through the pettifog and performance presented and an opportunity to see one’s way clear to navigate another day.
Native man says “The blessing isn’t what you ask for, it’s what you’re grateful for.”
And then, in final circle, the thought: What I am is this moment creating (Itself) through this person, this moment.
The Itself (The Creator) is creating through each person each moment as we open ourselves to the creation with gratitude.
We say goodbye.
We walk back to housing, walk out through clanking doors to front lobby out into walkway down to parking lot.
Next week is Independence Day.
We wish one another the grace of such a prospect.
To move through into genuine and liberating interdependence.
I used to be naive
used to think there
were good guys
and bad guys
now I suspect
I was wrong
there are no
good guys
we’re all
compromised
would do the
necessary to
avoid the inevitable --
lie, cheat, coverup
tell me I’m wrong
you’ve not capitulated
don’t worry, I won’t
ask for details, just don’t
pretend angelic innocence
it doesn’t fit, won’t fly
now that we’re clear
i've a proposition, let's
make a deal -- you
and me --
here’s the deal --the next
time the ill-begotten
comes calling, we’ll
not answer, not again
but suffer the pain
of what has gone by
remembering, without
bitterness, who we are
Poetry helps.
GIFT
by Czeslaw Milosz
A day so happy.
Fog lifted early. I worked in the garden.
Hummingbirds were stopping over honeysuckle flowers.
There was no thing on earth I wanted to possess.
I knew no one worth my envying him.
Whatever evil I had suffered, I forgot.
To think that once I was the same man did not embarrass me.
In my body I felt no pain.
When straightening up, I saw the blue sea and sails.
-- Czesław Miłosz, Berkeley 1971, translated by the poet
I am listening to novel 1984 in French.
It goes on and on during nap
In a dream therein i am on floor outside door in someone’s apartment listening to novel in French. Door is ajar. I’m unsure who it is inside, it is a woman, and I’m thinking she’ll be intrigued someone outside her door is listening to novel in French.
I might be in a meditation hall. I turn over and straighten out zabuton, zafu, blanket, a tee shirt. When my back is turned the person inside tosses out crumpled bag of what might be pretzels. I think this a good omen. I never get to see who she is.
I awake. I am in chapter five. I find the novel in French as I listen to it in French. They are two different translations from English. I follow along.
I write to senators King and Collins:
Frustration and disgust.
Surely you and Sen Collins [Sen King] see the insanity of policy and person of Oval Office re immigration, ICE, blatant disregard for law and rights of individuals.
I cannot believe that there is nothing you can do to counter such disregard, cruelty, and lawlessness.
This, as well as his erratic behavior and unseemly communications. He disgraces the office and the country.
I appeal to you and your senate colleagues to stop him now.
Please!
But there’s no poetry in slovenly moral unseemliness.
It’s not the same as Tibet, yet:
Betrayal
My father died
defending our home,
our village, our country.
I too wanted to fight.
But we are Buddhist.
People say we should be
Peaceful and Non-Violent.
So I forgive our enemy.
But sometimes I feel
I betrayed my father.
(--Tenzin Tsundue)
My father was an Eisenhower/Nixon republican (1953-1961). Nixon might have been a little creepy, but he was no full blown reprobate as is occurring now.
"People say we should be / Peaceful and Non-Violent” -- but the forces of abstruse contemporary governance are pushing the limits of responding to frustration with civility.
The Dalai Lama is turning 90 on 6july. He remains talisman and icon to Tibetans and the world. As long a life as you need, friend! As long as your spiritual name 'Jetsun Jamphel Ngawang Lobsang Yeshe Tenzin Gyatso'! God knows we are better for your being here among us.
I think of forgiving the current occupant of the White House, but a sour taste appears in my mouth and psyche. So I’ll practice further.
There’s no poetry in punching someone in the face. There’s no good rhyme for orange.
This president says that all presidents before him were dumb.
If I did write a poem about him I’d write:
since you arrived
I feel stupider
for not knowing
how dogs recognize
a good man from bad
But there are no paeans for dreaded non-enthusiastiasm, nor for figures whose ankles are caked with muck and mire, whose hearts and lives do not inspire, whose character is devoid of a single shred of wise inquiry or benevolent desire.
(If I shut up now, do I get credit for getting off the bus before arriving at my ticketed destination?)
Goons rush in
Bounty hunters
In masks
Soon,
Soon
the backlash
One deranged
Man full of
Delusion
Half the
Country
Insane for him
David Whyte and the old woman show up.
The Old Interior Angel
Young, male andimmortal as I was,I stopped at the first sightof that broken bridge.
The taut cables snappedand the bridge planksconcertina-edinto a crazy jumbleover the drop,four hundred feetto the craggystream.
I sat and watchedthe wind shiveron the broken planks,as if by looking hardand long enough,the life-linemight spontaneouslyrepair itself,-but watched in vain.
An hour I satin silence,checking eachinvoluntary movementof the body towardthat tremblingbridgewith a fearful mind,and an emphaticshake of the head.
Finally, facing defeatand about to go backthe way I cameto meet the others.
Three days roundby another pass.
Enter the old mountain womanwith her stooped gait,her dark clothesand her dung basketclasped to her back.
Small feet shufflingfor the preciousgold-brownfuel for cooking food.
Intent on the groundshe glimpsed my feetand looking upsaid “Namaste”“I greet the God in you”the last syllableheld like a song.
I inclined my headand clasped my handsto reply, butbefore I could look up,she turned her lined faceand went straight acrossthat shivering chaosof woodand broken steelin one movement.
One day the herosits down,afraid to takeanother step,and the old interior angellimps slowly inwith her no-nonsensecompassionand her old secretand goes ahead.
“Namaste”you sayand follow.-from River Flow: New & Selected Poems, originally published in Fire in the Earth
The question is not whether there is a God.
The question is God.
And when we look, and when we ask --
There
there is
God.
Theologians say
You cannot talk
About the cross
Without talking
About
Resurrection
(Why a corpus
On the cross?)
The horror
Of cruelty
Death and
Resurrection
Are one thing (hint)
One resonance
No one
Without other
No other
Only one
Infinitely diverse
Different
(Unseeing this
Unknowing this)
Is opening
Prayer, opening
To nothing other
Nothing at all
Each reality merely
Itself
And itself
Whole
(and yet, no
Grasping this)
Only (“per”
Through)
I have never
written a poem
do you hear me?
Have you ever
written a poem?
Didn’t you hear me --
I have never written a poem
then, its settled
what is?
What is settled?
You have never
Written a poem
Thanks for stopping
Bye
two grackles
on white fence
at prison farm
watch Oso negro
pickup truck turn
out of parking lot
after conversation
about confidence,
skill, deconstruction,
Puddles Pity Party
Leonard Cohen --
Golden Retriever
chewing on iron
barbell, happily
wriggly -- meanwhile
on fence, "from modern
Latin Gracula, from
Latin graculus
‘jackdaw’”-- ah,
inquisitiveness
when my father died
fifty years ago today
we found half-full
pint bottles of whiskey
in chest of drawers
with socks, handkerchiefs,
teeshirts and shorts --
in his 20s when The
Depression began,
Defense non-combat
boatyard through WWII
furniture salesman at
A.H.Stiehl’s in NYC
a good man with empty
bottles who also visited poor
families in parish with
St Vincent de Paul brothers
when they needed help
never speaking of it at homedeciding it was so between Greek
and Latin exercises -- deciding?
life for him was grid of concrete
and asphalt, his nostalgia for green
a feared intruder (why that phrase?)
had entered the house, I sat
on front porch under tree shade
he lay dead in small room, heart
just gave out, asking his wife
to take off his shoes, still, gone
collapsing in kitchen, crawled
I drove down West Side Highway
through Battery Tunnel under
Twin Towers to sit on bed with him
still, gone, before body released
taken to funeral home blocks away
house now empty, room empty,
pint bottles empty, prayer as well