Student:
I agree with most of what the author said in this chapter. However, there are probably many unknown circumstances that contributed to the Shaolin monk’s decision to create a system of martial arts. I believe the rationale the monks employed to justify the creation, and execution of an art that seems to conflict with their beliefs, is as timeless as sand. Of course, whether their commitment to martial skills conflicted with their beliefs is debatable. I personally think it does, but that contradiction returns the near mythical mystique of these venerable monks back to the[ realm of humanity.
Tutor:
Enjoyed thinking along with you.
I loved your thesis sentence: "The root of my topic really is the rationale human beings use to justify actions that contradict their belief systems or even their conscience."
It contains four fascinating areas of thought; (maybe 5):
1. human beings
2. justifiable actions
3. belief systems
4. conscience
For me, it invites some of my thinking:
1. So many use the word “human” as a justification of imperfection (“I’m only human.”) I feel this is a misuse. I submit we are not yet human. Someone (I don’t remember who) said something like: To be truly human is to be human/divine. There might be a Christ-related insinuation in such a statement. But it intrigues me. Are we on the way to being human? Is contemporary man the missing link between primates and the human being? Is the real revelation of the Christian metaphor – not that we are sinful and deserving of condemnation – but that we are in process and have no fixed identity in this fluctuating state we find ourselves presently. That our true dwelling place is in the ambience of compassion and radical truth?
2. We act because actions are what is required of us. (E.g. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.) We are creatures of movement. The question is – to what are we moving?
3. When the movement and the fluctuating uncertainty become too difficult for us, we create beliefs to slow and root us. Belief is a holding place for the activity of thought which is quickly and always on its way elsewhere.
4. We have a natural and unassailable rock foundation in our developing nature for assessing what is right and what is wrong. We are, I submit, situationally astute and morally aware of what we should do and what we should not do. But then, at this point, we have to return to your thesis sentence.
You send me to the exhortation so often heard – that we should have the courage of our convictions.
Tricky word, “conviction”:
Definition of conviction
1: the act or process of finding a person guilty of a crime especially in a court of law
2a: a strong persuasion or belief
b: the state of being convinced
3a: the act of convincing a person of error or of compelling the admission of a truth
b: the state of being convinced of error or compelled to admit the truth
I’m going with 3b. We are compelled to admit the truth. To let it in. It is there. It most likely is the ground of being. It is what we are.
Admitting what we are – ah – there’s our difficulty and our glorious potential.
So it comes down to your thesis sentence.
And then there’s #5 of the fascinating areas of thought:
5. rationale – “a set of reasons or a logical basis for a course of action or a particular belief.”
Instead of operating from the felt center of our being, we, novices of logic and belief, create reasons for our turning away from the truth/truths we inherently know.
And here we are.
Thanks for the prompt.
[per. jw ]

